Putin’s
Russian revival
S P
SETH
An important development in world affairs, contours of which are
slowly emerging, is the slow but steady emergence of Russia as an important
player. The collapse of the Soviet Union in early nineties was bemoaned by Russia’s
President Vladimir Putin as the “greatest geopolitical catastrophe” of the 20th
century.” When this was happening, Putin was a small fry in the vast Soviet
intelligence apparatus. Apparently, the scale of the tragedy dawned on him when
he became the country’s president in the year 2000. Since then he has held this
position except for one term, when Dmitry Medvedev held the office from 2008 to
2012 as constitutionally Putin couldn’t consecutively hold the office after two
terms. Putin was re-elected president third time last year, and the two swapped
their respective offices, with Medvedev taking over as prime minister.
Returning to the collapse of the Soviet Union, it made Russia into a
virtual economic and political basket case, with the then president, Boris Yeltsin,
sinking increasingly into a state of drunken buffoonery, parceling out the
country’s economic assets, more or less, for free among booty hunters. Yeltsin
picked up Putin as his successor, apparently on the advice of some of these
newly minted tycoons who reasoned that, with virtually no political pedigree
and base, Putin would be easy to manipulate. But how wrong they were! When some
among them sought to outmaneuver Putin or crossed his political path, they
either ended up in jail or in exile fearing for their lives.
Vladimir Putin soon established himself as a seasoned and ruthless president
but he also cultivated popular support in his own way. For instance, Putin went
hard on the Chechens’ insurgency to break away from Russia. Their terror
campaign, reaching right into Moscow, was causing great insecurity and fear
among many Russian citizens. And Putin, in his usual brutal way, managed to
create his own reign of terror in Chechnya installing a regime that was, more
or less, a killing machine. This regime, with Moscow’s help, has managed to
create surface calm in Chechnya, though there is no pretense of winning over
the people. And, in an odd sort of way, this has reinforced with many Russians
Putin’s image as a man of action.
In the realm of foreign affairs and national security, Putin
squelched Georgian president’s military intervention to occupy South Ossetia,
an erstwhile part of Georgia that had, in effect, carved out a separate
existence under Russian patronage and support. If the Georgian president was
banking on American and European support against a Russian counter-attack, he
soon found out that he was really on his own. The Russian military push ended
right inside Georgia. The conflict ended with French mediation. Russia ended up creating two independent
states of South Ossetia and Abkhazia under its control, though neither is internationally
recognized. Even though the crisis in South Ossetia occurred in 2008 when
Dmitri Medvedev was Russia’s president, Putin was known to be the real boss of Russia even as
the country’s then prime minister.
And now he has thrown out a lifeline to Ukraine, though it is not
welcome by many Ukrainians seeking the overthrow of their pro-Russian regime. They,
in fact, want Ukraine to join the European Union. Whether or not Putin’s deal
with Ukraine’s President, Viktor Yanukovych, to bail out its economy with a $15
billion loan, and hefty discount on Russian gas sales to the country, will calm
down the political unrest in the country would remain to be seen. But the
alternative of union with the European Union might not be much help to lift out
Ukraine from its economic morass. The European Union alternative would require
an economic austerity package, with cuts everywhere that might not be what the
Ukrainians want.
And within Russia, Putin is all ‘forgiveness’ these days for those
who ‘sinned’ against him and the Russian state, which is one and the same thing
really. For instance, he is going to make quite a few thousands of people happy
by pardoning them for their crimes. Among them are the two young girls from the
rock band, Pussy Riot, serving sentences for their lyrics insulting Putin at
Moscow’s main cathedral, though they still find him unbearable politically. And even more generously, he has pardoned and
released Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who has already served 10 years in jail charged
with fraud, tax evasion and other economic crimes, but really because he dared
to fund Putin’s political opponents.
And on the larger question of human rights violations and abuses, he
has been able to expose the US and
Britain by simply giving asylum to the US whistleblower, Edward Snowdon, with
his treasure trove of US National Security Agency’s (NSA) comprehensive
surveillance of its citizens and that of people around the world, including
some of the US’ best allies and their leaders.
The Middle East is another area where Putin’s Russia is staging a
comeback of sorts. The recent visit to Egypt of the Russian foreign and defence
ministers, which I analyzed in my recent column (Daily Times, December 11), is
an important development. The US’s perceived vacillation and lack of steadfast
support for rebels in Syria, and diplomatic parleys with Iran on the nuclear
question, have brought some stinging criticism from its long-standing friends
and allies in the Middle East. Bahrain, a close ally of Saudi Arabia, has come
out with a no-holds barred attack on Washington’s “transient and reactive”
foreign policy in the region. According to Bahrain’s Crown Prince Sheikh
Salaman bin Hamad al-Khalifa, “The Russians have proved [with Syria] they are
reliable friends”, adding: “As a result, some states in the region have already
started to look at developing more multilateral relations rather than just
relying on Washington.” To add insult to injury, he said, “America seems to
suffer from schizophrenia when it deals with the Arab world.”
Saudi Arabia, the US’ key ally in the Middle East has made no secret
of its displeasure with the Washington’s lack of resoluteness in dealing with
Syria and Iran. The US has come under criticism from the country’s current and
former spy chiefs. In a recent visit to the kingdom, the US Secretary of State,
John Kerry, sought to reassure that the US was committed to defend Saudi Arabia
from an external attack (an apparent reference to a perceived threat from
Iran). He also assured the Saudis that that the US would keep the kingdom
informed about developments in the talks with Iran on its nuclear programme so
that “there are no surprises.” While Kerry’s visit and assurances might soothe
the Saudis to a degree, but there is now an element of distrust on the Saudi
side. When Saudi Foreign Minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal, said in his opening
remarks at a news conference with Kerry after their meeting, “A true
relationship between friends is based on sincerity, candor and frankness… “, he
was obviously making a serious point.
All this must be sweet music to Putin’s ears to make him feel a good
deal better than at the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Note: This article was first published in the Daily Times.
Contact: sushilpseth@yahoo.com.au
