Trump
phenomena
S.P.SETH
The US election result, with Donald Trump as president-elect, has
thrown up so many issues and problems that will continue to be debated in the
time to come. Both at home in the US and abroad, there will be cause for alarm
at the turn the country appears to be taking. Only eight years ago, in 2008,
the US made history by electing an Afro American as its president, creating so
much hope and excitement. It was to be the beginning of a post-racial America,
seemingly turning its back on the cruel and tortuous history of slavery to
create an inclusive America. At the time of Barack Obama’s election, I happened
to be in a small, largely progressive, US university town. It was amazing to
experience the kind of self-congratulation some academics felt at the result,
as if all the history that preceded it was somehow simply fiction. And Obama’s
election validated, as they saw it, that the country’ core was always decent
and human, as laid down in its constitution. Obama personified for many the
beginning of a new era of hope across political, racial and any other divide.
Obama certainly believed it strongly, and sought to govern as an inclusive
president. The country certainly needed a healing touch after the Bush period of
endless military conflict in the Middle East and the global financial crisis
that was sapping the confidence and morale of the world’s most powerful
country.
A number of important features have characterized American success
in the past. First, the US emerged as the leader of the western world after
WW11. Which, not surprisingly, created an intense belief in American
‘exceptionalism’ and American ‘dream’. The first also led to a sense of
entitlement that the US was indeed a special country and its leadership of the
‘free world’ was a given. Furthermore, its value system of democracy and
neo-liberalism was the model for the rest of the world. The US felt validated
and reinforced when it ‘won’ the Cold War. And it contributed to “irrational
exuberance” in its economic policies of deregulation, leading to the marketing
of shoddy products based on unsustainable debt that created the global
financial crisis, still with us in so many ways.
The working of the economy was based on the belief that ‘free’
markets were self-correcting mechanism that directed resources to the sectors
that needed it the most. The 2007-8 recession proved it wrong, but
restructuring the ‘free’ market beast, like any religious or ideological belief,
is difficult because it is so much a part of the system that has supported the
edifice of neo-liberalism in all its manifestations. In other words, the US and
western economies in general are caught in a rapid in the fast churning waters
of economic ‘liberalism’, unable to be rescued. This is where the US found
itself after the Reagan era when the financial system was awash with easy money
and the illusion that the economy had nowhere to go but upward. Which created
the financial crisis, denting this self-image that the US was on an upward
trajectory forever.
The impending crisis converged with and, indeed, in no small measure,
was also caused by America’s wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which cost the US
about $2 trillion and continuing. Americans are not used to failure. And this
failure to complete the mission and/or to extricate from it with dignity over
the last 15 years is a daily reminder that the US is no longer the power it
used to be. The mantra of free trade and globalization, against the de-industrialized
hubs of mid-west, called the rust belt, makes those parts of the US look like wasteland,
with high rates of unemployment and resultant anger and sense of displacement.
This is not to suggest that globalization is responsible for all
this. Globalization and free trade had its pluses and minuses, with the US
gaining most from the digital revolution of the internet era, pioneered and
expanded by the US giants like Google and the likes. Some of these giants are
valued at more than the GDP of quite a good number of countries. What has gone
wrong is that the de-industrialization of the US has not gone hand in hand with
parallel development of new sectors of economy like the alternative energy of
renewables, retraining and new training and exploring new areas of economic
growth where quantative measurement, otherwise called productivity growth in
material goods, is not the litmus test of economic health. This obsessive
belief in statistical measurement based on a basket of goods and its continuing
growth, and automation replacing workers, is causing social and economic
misery.
The increasing concentration of wealth among banking and investment sectors
and digital giants and elsewhere is creating income inequalities and inequities
that are brewing an insurgent situation, challenging and blaming the
establishment and elites, virtually calling for the overthrow of the system.
There is a sense that anything that replaces the status quo, personified by
Hillary Clinton and the likes, can only be an improvement. This is where the
Trump phenomena and Brexit have become the alternative and populist voice of
change. And add to this the level of anxiety caused by ‘threats’ from
immigration, Muslims, multiculturalism, IS and terrorism, and the perceived
undermining of the privileged position of hegemony exercised by white sectors
of society in the US and in other European societies, it then builds up an
image of siege among many sections of these societies.
The demographic change in the US is illustrative of this. Its white population is likely to lose its
majority in the next few decades, thus losing its privileged position to
non-whites---blacks, Latinos, Asians and so on. In other words, America’s white
population, who have put Trump into power, are in a hurry to reverse this
process by such measures as restricting immigration, sending back ‘illegals’, building
walls and, above all, changing the rules to make voting by minorities
increasingly complicated and difficult. Some of the republican states have
already been moving in this direction. The US is now polarized, with half the
country turning against the other half. How will this work out under Trump as
president is anybody’s guess? But if one goes by all the incendiary remarks
that he made on a whole lot of issues during the election, the picture is quite
bleak. What one can say with some certainty is that it will be a bumpy ride
ahead, if not worse.
Note: This article first appeared in the Daily Times.
Contact: sushilpseth@yahoo.com.au