Managing US-China relations
S P SETH
When the US whistleblower, Edward Snowden, was
allowed by Hong Kong authorities to fly to Moscow, where he is seeking
temporary asylum, it put a damper on US-China relations. Having revoked
Snowden’s passport and made a formal request with Hong Kong for his extradition
on spying charges, the US was hopeful that they would have their man to face
the music back home where he was likely to be locked up for the rest of his
life. Hong Kong, as part of China, apparently followed Beijing’s directions to
be rid of him to avoid entanglement in an unseemly and long diplomatic and
legal stoush with the US. Hong Kong authorities argued at the time that they
couldn’t detain him, as the paper work from the US was deficient and
incomplete. That is the benign explanation. The US didn’t buy this, contending
that Beijing’s handling of the Snowden affair would damage US-China relations.
The management of US-China relations has been tricky
with the rise of China. Beijing has long harboured the suspicion that the
United States is trying to contain China. Indeed it has said this much now and
then. The US is increasingly aware that China is emerging as the other
superpower. The recent summit between President Xi Jinping and the US President
Barack Obama in the informal surroundings of a presidential retreat in
California was, in a sense, an acknowledgement of it. China and the US are
engaged in a competing and contending relationship, particularly in the
Asia-Pacific region. This requires deft handling to avoid entanglement in a nasty
conflict.
China would like to regard Asia-Pacific region as
its own backyard, like the US has done with the Monroe Doctrine warning off
external powers from its backyard in Western Hemisphere. China would like to do
the same in its region. The US, with its Pacific coastline in California,
Hawaii and its Pacific territories, regards itself as much a Pacific country as
China. Besides, it has a string of military alliances with a number of regional
countries and extensive trade and strategic interests.
Even as China has been seeking to establish its
regional preeminence in the last decade or so, the US decided to checkmate it
(formally) by Obama’s announcement in 2011, during an Australian visit, of his
country’s “pivot” to Asia. Which would make Asia-Pacific region the primary
focus of US power, with much of its naval deployment concentrated in the
region. This announcement obviously rattled China.
In the last few years, Beijing has been engaged in a
series of disputes with some of its neighbours over maritime boundaries in
South China Sea and East China Sea. China strongly believes in the authenticity
of its claims based on history. At the same time, it is also seeking to test the
limits of the US commitment to the region and its allies. Undoubtedly, there is
an element of brinkmanship, which, if not handled carefully, might lead to
confrontation.
President Xi Jinping seems aware of this danger and
during their recent summit in the US the two presidents sought to concentrate
on how best to manage their difficult relationship. Even as regional
territorial disputes between China and its neighbors have become a matter of
serious concern, another issue cropped up to cause friction between the US and
China. And this was Washington’s deep concern about cyber attacks from China,
some even said to be emanating from within the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).
The US alleges that these attacks on US companies have cost them billions of
dollars worth of intellectual property theft. And they introduce a dangerous
element of cyber warfare between the two countries.
The summit, therefore, sought to deal with managing
US-China relations over regional maritime disputes and cyber hacking/espionage.
And they reportedly declared their determination to keep these issues, as New
York Times reported, “from descending into a Cold War mentality and to avoid
the pitfalls of a rising power [China] confronting an established one.” This is
the real problem. The recent history, in terms of the two world wars, is not
reassuring on managing relations between an emerging superpower and an
established one, especially when the emerging power (China, in this case)
believes that the US is trying to limit its ‘legitimate’ sphere of influence.
Just after the US-China summit came the Snowden spy
saga revealing that the US was also hacking into Chinese systems. This has seriously
embarrassed and compromised US position accusing China of hacking into US
economic and defense secrets. Not surprisingly, a Chinese foreign ministry
spokesperson said, obviously with some glee, that, “I would like to advise
these people [US officials] to hold up a mirror, reflect and take care of their
own situation first.” At the same time by not getting entangled in the Snowden
affair China has acted smartly. Of course, it has displeased the US and might
further complicate US-China relations, so soon after an apparently successful
summit between their leaders.
There was one positive outcome of the summit to
please the US especially. And that was about North Korea’s nuclear
ambitions. According to the US
media reporting on the subject, “US and Chinese officials appear to be finally
on the same page on how to contain a nuclear North Korea”, including using
China’s economic leverage and keeping the young North Korean leader, Kim
Jong-un, on the outer until he fell in line. It is clear that Pyongyang is
already feeling the heat from China. A recent visit to China of a high-level North
Korean emissary didn’t get much traction. Apparently, he was told that
Pyongyang should lower the temperature and resume nuclear talks. And North
Korea has been making overtures to South Korea and the US. The recent visit to
China of the South Korean President Park Geun-hye and high level talks with the
top Chinese leadership was another signal to Pyongyang of Beijing’s displeasure.
China and South Korea are both agreed on denuclearization of Korea (North Korea).
This is a positive development as far as it goes.
But if regional disputes flare up, and with US committed to its regional
allies, China might not push North Korea too much into the abyss because it
remains a useful strategic buffer against the United States.
In a nutshell, the recent US-China summit was a
useful development though marred by the subsequent Snowden affair. But Joseph
Nye, the Harvard political scientist and an old hand on US-China affairs, was way
off the mark when he reportedly described the summit as “…the most important
meeting between an American president and a Chinese leader in 40 years since
Nixon and Mao.”
Note: This article was first published in the Daily Times.
Contact: sushilpseth@yahoo.com.au
No comments:
Post a Comment