A
Muslim as president of France?
S P
SETH
The day of the of the terrorist attack (January 7) on the satirical
French magazine, Charlie Hebdo, a novel by a French author appeared with the
title Soumission (Submission in English) that soon became a widely read and
reviewed book. Its author Michel Houellebecq has written other novels too and
is now well-established, inviting controversy. His latest novel, Submission, is
particularly controversial because of its timing and the subject matter
coinciding, with the Charlie Hebdo affair and a succession of other terrorist events,
like the Paris carnage. Being a work of fiction, it boldly or foolishly,
pictures a coalition in 2022 emerging out of a near political deadlock in
France led by a Muslim party with its leader, Mohammed Ben Abbas, emerging as
the country’s president and setting in motion the transformation of French
society on traditional Islamic values. And this is all happening peacefully and
without any real protests in France. This
fictional account is happening against the backdrop of the violence recently unleashed
on France by terrorism. No wonder a novel talking about a peaceful
transformation to a political order based on Islamic values was bound to raise
hackles.
The novel explores two interrelated themes. The first suggests the
progressive breakdown of French/Western societies where communal and familial
connections are not working. Francois, the main character in the novel is a
44-year old academic at Sorbonne teaching literature whose life appears drained
of any excitement or passion. He does his job routinely and has very little
social and intellectual interaction at his work place. He is socially awkward
and fails to develop any long-term relationship with women, though he manages
to have sex with girl friends but they always move on. One girl, who is Jewish,
that has shown some affection for him with potential to develop into a loving
relationship has moved to Israel with her parents, because of the fear
generated by political developments in France surrounding the success of the
Muslim Fraternity party with Mohammed Ben Abbas later becoming the country’s
president.
Francois’ sense of loneliness and hopelessness is thus expressed
when he says: “There is no Israel for me.” He has no contact with his parents
who are divorced and when he is informed by the relevant agency about his mother’s
death and the need for arrangements on his part for her burial, he doesn’t
respond. The authorities bury his mother in a pauper’s grave, as it might seem.
He projects his own sense of loneliness and despair on to the larger French
society where many, he imagines, live a life of loneliness like him without
social connections and a purposeful life.
And the politics of the country is as sterile with main political
parties, Socialists and Conservatives (UMP), going through the periodic charade
of elections, governing the country by turn without any substantial change of
policies and politics. Francois’ contempt for such ‘democracy’ is brutal when
he says,” Western nations took a strange pride in this system, though it
amounted to little more than a power-sharing deal between two rival gangs, and
they would even go to war to impose it on nations that failed to share their
enthusiasm.” In a sense, France appears to have reached a dead end, both in
terms of people’s individual lives and collectively.
It is precisely at this time and against this backdrop that the
Muslim Fraternity party and its leader, Mohammed Ben Abbes, appear as a
moderate political force to give the country a clear direction. And they seem
like a breath of fresh air. As the novel proceeds towards its conclusion, it
thus sums up (as a fictional account) the state of Europe’s decomposition. It
says, “The facts were plain: Europe had reached a point of such putrid
decomposition that it could no longer save itself, any more than fifth-century
Rome could have done. This wave of new immigrants, with their traditional
culture—of natural hierarchies, the submission of women and respect for
elders—offered a historic opportunity for the moral and familial rearmament of
Europe. These immigrants held out the hope of a new age for the old continent.
Some were Christian; but there was no denying that the vast majority were
Muslim.” Besides, Ben Abbas was planning to expand the political and cultural
boundaries of Europe to include some African/Arab countries, but it was all
meant to be a peaceful project.
Francois, the novel’s main character and narrator, who lost his
academic job when Sorbonne became Islamic, gets his job back after converting
to Islam at the persuasion of the new university president who is himself a
convert. Francois (or the author Houellebecq, to the extent he is represented
by the narrator of the novel) is very much impressed by the university
president’s new life with more than one wife as he puts it, “…a forty-year old
wife to do the cooking, a fifteen-year old wife for whatever else… No doubt he
had one or two wives in between…” And for Francois this is an ideal society
where he wouldn’t need to be looking for his sexual conquests. Like some of his
colleagues he would have no difficulty in the department of wives that will be
arranged for him and serve him in a submissive (hence the title, Submission)
role. In this hierarchical society with structured roles, the woman submitted
to man, with final submission to God from all.
In France’s new political world with a Muslim president, the economy
is already looking up with unemployment down, as women leave work and given
subsidies to raise more children. Which would also have the effect of reversing
a decline in France’s population. At the same time, Arab money from Saudi
Arabia and Qatar is flowing in to prop up things.
It all sounds very exciting and a neat solution for Europe’s rebirth
under a charter of Islamic traditions and values. But it is too neat and hence
not realistic. If anything, the right spectrum of European polity is feeding on
Islamophobia. One reviewer in the London Review of Books called it “deeply
reactionary [but], it is not Islamophobic.” Indeed, Houllebecq appears to have
made a volte face on Islam which he had described before as “the most stupid,
false and obscure of all religions… doomed just as surely as Christianity.” But
in his novel, Submission, he appears to suggest that it might be the solution
to the crisis overtaking French/European civilization. Even though the novel
has generated great interest and controversy, one shouldn’t lose sight of the
fact that it is a fictional narrative and shouldn’t be taken as the pathway to
France’s political transformation in 2022 and beyond.
No comments:
Post a Comment