Indonesia
confronts its future
S P
SETH
Indonesia will soon have a new president following presidential
elections in that country. In a bitterly contested and controversial election,
Joko Widodo (popularly known as Jokowi), the presidential candidate of the
Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P), finally prevailed. And it was
a convincing win by a margin of over 6 percentage points, more than 8 million
votes. His rival, Prabowo Subianto, a former general and son-in-law of the
discredited dictator Suharto, who was overthrown in a popular uprising in 1998,
didn’t take his defeat kindly. And he contested it in the Constitutional Court,
but lost. Jokowi will now take over the presidency in late-October.
It is as well that an unsavoury and ruthless character like Subianto
didn’t win. During the time he was a general in the army under his
father-in-law’s rule, Parabowo Subianto was accused of kidnapping and killings
to help perpetuate Suharto’s dictatorship when it was in a terminal stage.
Having unsuccessfully tried to contest presidency before, he was hoping to make
it this time. It was felt that the Indonesian people were hankering for a
strong man in the image of his father-in-law, Suharto, who had ruled for over
30 years, because the country’s democracy had become flabby and discredited
with large-scale corruption and all round venality. And he projected himself as
the strong man that the country needed and hopefully was looking for. In other
words, he was the right man at the right time. But it didn’t work.
Prabowo was flushed with money, his election financed by his
billionaire brother. He is a rich man in his own right. But he under-estimated
his rival, Jokowi, who came out as too ordinary to be taken seriously. And he
also reportedly had the support of elements in the army at local and higher
levels. The bias for Prabowo in the army, despite denials, must have been quite
serious as to warrant the sacking of the army chief, General Budiman, a day
before the election result was announced. Subianto tried to muster and engineer
wide protests to put pressure on the Constitutional Court to invalidate
Jokowo’s victory but it all proved futile. That a discredited general, accused
of gross violation of human rights, could be a serious presidential candidate,
securing as much as 46 per cent of the votes, indicates that Indonesia’s
democracy still needs careful nurturing. It also shows that important segments
of the army still hanker for the ‘good old Suharto days’.
Widodo’s election will mark a sharp break, hopefully for the better,
in Indonesia’s polity. So far all the post-Suharto presidents have had old
political and army association with that past. The outgoing, but popularly
elected, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, was a Suharto-era general. Widodo
will be the first Indonesia president with no connection to the sordid
Suharto-era. He is self-made, starting almost from scratch to become a
successful small businessman. He started his political career as a small town
mayor of Solo where, by all accounts, he did a creditable job and without any
taint of corruption and venality, a highly unusual trait in a politician. His
next stop was the governorship of Jakarta, a much more challenging job. He
apparently wasn’t as successful in the country’s capital but, at the same time,
there were no scandals about him.
Indonesia very badly needs an honest and accessible man as president
with a common man image. And Jokowi has these attributes. It is was this
persona that got Jokowi the presidential nomination of Indonesian Democratic
Party of Struggle (PDI-P), led by Megawati Sukarnoputri, the daughter of the
country’s leading freedom fighter and its first president. She would much
rather have wanted the presidency for herself but didn’t seem likely to win.
Jakowi was a rising political star and his sponsorship seemed the only way for
the Sukarno dynasty to make a political comeback of sorts.
But that is where the problems might arise. First, Jakowi is not
part of their patronage network. He is an outsider picked up for his popular
appeal. The question then arises: will he or will he not do their bidding? Second,
Megawati’s daughter, Puan Maharani, is said to be politically ambitious, and
they (PDI-P leadership) won’t be comfortable about Jokowi becoming too settled
in his presidential role. Third, Jokowi’s PDI-P doesn’t command majority in the
national parliament. That would make his task of governing effectively and
purposefully quite onerous. The consequent wheeling and dealing among the same
set of corrupt politicians might rub off the shine from Jokowi’s fresh and
untainted image.
Therefore, unless Jokowi can establish himself, early on, as his own
man to deliver on people’s expectations that are quite high, he might not only
lose popular appeal but, more importantly, it will further damage Indonesia’s
democratic polity and system. And with people like Probowo and his cronies
waiting to pounce on a perceived image of self-seeking, corrupt and grubby
politicians, one cannot rule out an even greater nostalgia for the distorted (but
even more corrupt) past of strong arm rule of the Suharto era.
One redeeming feature, though, is the unbounded optimism of Jokowi.
In his victory speech, he sought to enthuse people with a new sense of
confidence and said, “This presidential election has provoked fresh optimism in
the Indonesian nation. An independent soul and sense of political
responsibility blossoms in…the new generation. Their enthusiasm—which had sunk
into torpor—has now returned.” He added, “It is now our responsibility to prove
to ourselves, to other nations and especially to our children and our
grandchildren, that politics is full of fun; politics has some wisdom. Politics
is freedom.”
At the present time, though, Indonesia seems unsure of its future.
Precisely at such a time a relatively fresh face, untainted by the past and
with a strong sense of optimism, might become the circuit breaker. By tapping
and instilling popular enthusiasm, Jokowo might be able to break through the
political strait jacket that is tying down Indonesia.
Note: This article first appeared in the Daily Times
Contact: sushilpseth@yahoo.com.au
No comments:
Post a Comment